On 5 October 2012 10:15, Ralph Corderoy <ra...@inputplus.co.uk> wrote:
> IMHO it's a shame the latter go for `true' and `false' for Booleans, and > the Python `reference implementation' laxly takes anything other than > `true' to be false. > ..ooOO(( should have picked up on this at the pub...)) Doesn't that position lead to a huge excluded middle, where values are neither true nor false? ( for comparison Perl can be a minefield, where any of the null string '', the integer 0, and an undefined value undef are all false.) -- best regards, Victor Churchill, Bournemouth -- Next meeting: ???, ???day, 2012-11-?? 20:00 Meets, Mailing list, IRC, LinkedIn, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ New thread on mailing list: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk How to Report Bugs Effectively: http://goo.gl/4Xue
