This is correct, but if I do “tcpdump -i br0 host <client-ip> and icmp” on the 
endian console, I can see ICMP packets coming through. But endian seems to drop 
them. I cannot confirm that they were dropped, but if I manually “route add” 
the route to the client, it works immediately. 

Thanks in advance,
Marco



Von: Jonathan Lessa [mailto:jonathanle...@gmail.com] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 2. August 2013 16:15
An: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Efw-user] Routing and ICMP

If everyone is on the same switch and the same LAN the ping does not 
necessarily pass through the Endian, the switch itself is responsible for 
making this delivery.
But if your Endian were physically between "cisco vpn box 2" and the server, 
then yes the Endian would be responsible for delivery.

2013/8/2 Marco Gabriel - inett GmbH <mgabr...@inett.de>
They are all on the green LAN, connected to the same switches. Client and 
“cisco vpn box 1” are on another LAN, only connected through a VPN link.
 
I know, this is not how we recommend to set this up, but it was like this when 
we came there.
 
Thanks,
Marco
 
 
Von: Jonathan Lessa [mailto:jonathanle...@gmail.com] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 2. August 2013 15:40
An: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Efw-user] Routing and ICMP
 
the "cisco vpn box 2", the Endian and other machines are on the same LAN green? 
Your "cisco vpn box 2" is connected directly to a network card Endian or a 
switch?
 
2013/8/2 Marco Gabriel - inett GmbH <mgabr...@inett.de>
Hello,
 
I have a strange problem that may be related to the endian way of policy based 
routing.
 
ICMP packages seem not to be routed properly.
 
Client -> cisco vpn box 1 -> public network -> cisco vpn box 2 -> endian -> 
server
 
RDP and other tcp/udp based services from client work, ICMP packets are sent to 
the server, the server answers but the packets seem not to be forwarded by the 
endian to the cisco vpn box 2. The cisco vpn box 2 and the endian are both in 
the same green LAN and the endian has configured a static route to static 
gateway “cisco vpn box 2”. As told, this works for all tested services but 
ICMP. 
 
If I set a route manually to the vpn box on the shell by using “route add”, it 
works. If I set a route directly on the client to the cisco box, it works too. 
 
So this seems to be a problem with the iptables way of routing packets.
 
Any hints how to fix this?
 
Best regards,
Marco
 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent
caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under
version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user



 
-- 
Att.:
Jonathan Lessa
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your SQL database under version control now!


Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent 
caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under 
version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net


https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent
caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under
version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user




-- 
Att.:
Jonathan Lessa
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Get your SQL database under version control now!

Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent 

caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under 

version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.

http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________

Efw-user mailing list

Efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent 
caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under 
version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user

Reply via email to