Guys, read what he wrote, not what you think he wrote.

He had a question about the operation of the metering in the KAT500, he wasn't looking for advice on antenna design or on the use of ladder line.

If he wants that he can read my paper here: 
http://k6mhe.com/n7ws/Ladder_Line.pdf


11/4/2015 3:37 PM, Fred Jensen wrote:
On 11/4/2015 12:59 PM, Phil Hystad wrote:

I use the KAT500 with my 80-meter dipole fed by ladder line and a 4:1
Balun to Coax for last 20 feet.  This antenna works excellently in
concert with the KAT500 for 80, 40, and 30 meter bands.  I don’t use
it with other bands.

Feed point Z's:
    1.9: 5.6-j1149
    3.9: 78+j2
    7.2: 2703+j2201

Your ladder line will transform these impedances to something else ... unless it happens to be a multiple of a half-wave at one of those frequencies. Tell me how long it is and we can calculate what it looks like on the high side of your 4:1 transformer. I don't recommend holding your breath that it will be good on all three bands though.

This weekend, I was curious as to how close (or far) the KAT500 could
bring the antenna in for the 160 meter band.  I knew that it would
not work though I was wondering how bad it would be.

The radiation resistance on 160 will be very low and the 4:1 transformer will divide it by 4, meaning just a tad above 1 ohm. It is also very reactive.

If you really want to use it on 160, try shorting the ladder line at the feed end, remove the transformer, and connect the shorted end to the coax through a variable cap. Run 1 or 2 wires on the ground from the coax shield and see if you can feed it as a Marconi-T.

If your ladder line is 60 ft long, feed Z at the shorted end of the ladder line will be about 110+j1400 and an Xc of 1400 ohms will probably work fine for the KAT500.

So, as I expected, the tuning never closed in on a descent SWR, the
best I saw on one test only was SWR about 49:1 as reported by the
KAT500 utility.  But, the BYPASS SWR reported was about 11:1.

SWR meters, which usually measure VSWR are fairly unreliable at high values of mismatch.

73,

Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the Cal QSO Party 1-2 Oct 2016
- www.cqp.org

Message delivered to w...@triconet.org

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to