> From: Zhang Wei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:06:40 +0800 > > The `cp' command of my installation don't preserve timestamps by > default
`cp' never did. Only the Windows copy commands do. > that makes the .elc files and the .el files have same timestamps as they > are installed, and causes a lot of "source is newer" messages. If they have the same timestamps, why do you get "source is newer" messages? I don't get them on my machine, and lread.c explicitly checks for .elc time _less_ than the .el time, not _less_or_equal_. Could you please look closer at this problem and tell where do the messages come from, and why? > -CP = cp -f > -CP_DIR = cp -rf > +CP = cp -fp > +CP_DIR = cp -rfp Thanks, but I don't want to rely on a GNU `cp' without checking. And I'd like us to understand the problem (which doesn't seem to happen to me) better before we consider solutions. In any case, thank you for your report. > In GNU Emacs 22.1.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) > of 2007-07-11 on BREP Does this happen in the released Emacs 22.1? > modified by Zhangwei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. What modifications are those? Is it possible that they cause the messages? _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
