> From: Zhang Wei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:37:41 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If they have the same timestamps, why do you get "source is newer" > > messages? I don't get them on my machine, and lread.c explicitly > > checks for .elc time _less_ than the .el time, not _less_or_equal_. > > Could you please look closer at this problem and tell where do the > > messages come from, and why? > > I'm not sure if the `make' program does multi-process `cp' when copying > files
Make won't do any multi-processing unless you use the -j switch. Did you? In any case, I don't see how even -j could cause this, because we copy the whole directory in one command. There's no way Make could split that single command into more than one, because it's not smart enough to understand what the command does. > but some of the .el files become 1 second or 2 seconds newer than > the corresponding .elc files after `make install' Please tell the details of the system on which this happens: what Windows version, on what type of filesystem(s) (NTFS, FAT, other) you have the relevant directories (the source one and the one that is the target of "make install"), etc. The versions of Make and the shell you are using and what kind of ports they are could also be of importance. _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
