Gerald Richter wrote:
Hi Neil,
I'm attaching the Embperl tar and the source file. You should
be able to duplicate what I am seeing using these... if not
then maybe reality is becoming even more distorted here in
America than I thought!
;-)
Let me know if/what you see...
I found the difference. You really used a "bug" in the 1.3 parser.
You wrote [$ hidden $] and I wrote [$hidden$]. The difference is the space
after the hidden. The 1.3 parser interprets this space as an first empty
argument. You can get the same result with [$ hidden , $] (with or without
spaces) in Embperl 2.
I think the way Embperl 2 behaves is more predictable and clean. I don't
think it makes sense to move this bug over to Embperl 2.
You can simple do a s/hidden/hidden ,/ in your code and things should
work with both versions.
Gerald
Thanks Gerald, that does work. Wow, I never realized I was using a bug all this
time! ;-)
I still think that it makes more sense to just use $fdat for all the form fields. It's simple: You
get all the inputs there, and you can then add things to it, and these will get included in the
hidden fields if you use [$ hidden $]. It's a one-stop-shop, all form data in one place.
But, your call of course. I'm sure it makes sense inside the code...
Thanks,
/Neil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
