> Gesendet: Montag, 05. Dezember 2022 um 21:12 Uhr > Von: "Bari" <bari00...@gmail.com> > An: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > Betreff: Re: [Emc-developers] A vision for working now to LinuxCnc version 10 > > On 12/5/22 10:57, Steffen Möller wrote: > > > > > I guess any such industrial decision making is equally based on the > > "unknown" when it comes to interoperability. The EU funds (did fund?) COST > > actions for this purpose - bring industrial and academic partners together > > and squeeze something like a joint standard out of them. Since quite a > > number of CNC companies are located in Europe, it seems like worthwhile to > > write something up with them. Any such COST action pays for travel, not for > > people, except some smallish side projects when someone visits cross > > country. Opinions? > > > Good idea. Do you have any more info on COST. Unfortunately they chose > an acronym that makes it difficult to search for.
https://www.cost.eu/ In 2010 or so I had helped writing a successful application. They have an open call. > Interesting to see some DDS performance testing. Looks like we might use > what they call "local delivery" for latency <1mS . > > https://www.rti.com/blog/latest-connext-dds-ros-2-performance-benchmarks It would make some good sense to me not to use DDS that currently runs in the base thread. I see a distributed control system. Many units that know the units that are neighboured (i.e. that they cooperate with) but do not need to see the complete world. And if the neighbours are allowed to be dynamic, then tis would then even work with mobile systems, but this is where ROS kicks in, right? Steffen _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
