> Several months later - but since there is no CIA feed posting commits in > real > time, the fact that one only accesses updates now and again is not a > problem. > Hence there has not really been a need to replace the anonymous SF access > since tap downloads can be used. They just do not provide all the tools > that > allow users to view committed changes against local copies of the code.
I tend to disagree. We still use CIA to report commits as they happen (both on IRC and as a RSS feed). You can see it here: http://cia.vc/stats/project/emc In addition to that each commit gets notified on the emc-commit mailing list, which is still at sourceforge. If you subscribe to that mailing list, you'll see the commits as they happen. > > The point I am trying to make is that these are just hurdles in the way of > users becoming involved. Probably not a problem if you are not an existing > SF > user, but they do get in the way where one has a proven working > development > environment :( I don't quite see the problems you mention. We tried to duplicate all services on our own (CIA, commit mailing, viewcvs, etc), and there are a couple new ones (or just a bit better than at SF): the viewcvs is way nicer, we have a LXR crossreference: http://cvs.linuxcnc.org/lxr/source ... Regards, Alex ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
