Stuart Stevenson wrote: > Gentlemen, > My question "Who votes?" was not a cynical, rhetorical, apathetic > comment. It was a legitimate question. I saw no ballot. I saw no > email. I did not have the opportunity to vote. > I will now expand on the first question. That way there will be NO > confusion as to the meaning of or the reason for my question. > What group is quailified to and has permission to vote? My vote > wouldn't have changed the outcome but I WOULD have voted if given the > opportunity. > For what it's worth. Is that a more clear question and statement? > thanks :( > Stuart
Ballots were supposed to go out to everyone who was subscribed to either the emc-users list or the emc-developers list, as of the July 24 when Chris posted the original request for nominations. You (Stuart) have been around for a while and certainly should have gotten one. When Michael sent this: > Hello, > > You should be receiving your ballots soon. Instructions for voting > are included. Happy voting. > to the users list on Aug 11, I got my ballot within a few minutes. I assumed that everybody else got theirs too. There were very few bounces - again from Michael: > 526 email addresses for eligible voters > 7 bounces > 73 ballots returned > > The rate of response was approximately 14%. Did anyone else who was subscribed to the list on July 24 NOT get a ballot? Regards, John Kasunich ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
