On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 11:27:57AM +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > The opt-in approach would actually cause you less work, since the > talk submission would be proof that the speaker is in fact aware of > the consequences. > > As you say: I don't think that doing licensing as part of a policy is > a legally sound way of doing this. At least in Germany, such a hidden > sign-over in the terms&conditions (which the policy is part of) > would be void due to its unexpected and surprising nature.
FWIW here's an excerpt from the LinuxTag 2008 speaker booklet:
We will record on an experimental basis some talks with a digital
camera / camcorder and store them for later processing. Some talks
may also be streamed live. For more details please see our website
or ask at the Speaker's Office. If you have strong objections
against being recorded, please contact us.
-- http://www.linuxtag.org/vcc/booklet2008.pdf
I don't remember if there was anything about recording in the speaker
registration form.
Marius Gedminas
--
As a rule of thumb, I reckon Python to be an order of magnitude more wasteful
of CPU cycles and memory than my favourite low-level language, C++.
-- Thomas Guest
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Europython-improve mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython-improve
