M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Michael Foord wrote:
John Pinner wrote:
I think what would be ideal would be to run it concurrently with the
tutorials on the Sunday - although I'll need to canvas potential
attendees. That way it doesn't interfere with the sprints.
Would this be ok?
I think doing it on Sunday afternoon would be good - developers
will likely arrive on that day, if they only plan to attend the
conference.
I think that would be the best day. We'll have to see what John thinks.
I'll need 'official' approval from the Python-dev crew, but it was
discussed previously and no-one was against the idea and lots in favour.
There was also talk of a PSF meeting but I'm not sure if there are
enough PSF members in Europe.
There are a number of PSF members in Europe, but not enough to
get a quorum.
Still, I believe that having a public meeting without
voting would make a good case for the PSF's goal of getting
more non-US supporters into the boat.
What would be the purpose and agenda of the meeting? In principle I
agree it would be good - nice to get Europe more active in the PSF - but
what would we do? If it's just a public q+a on the PSF then we could
propose it as a talk.
Michael
--
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
_______________________________________________
Europython-improve mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython-improve
