EV Digest 6794

Topics covered in this issue include:

  1) Re: EV Merchandise
        by "Kip C. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  2) Re: belly pan plastic
        by Danny Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  3) Re: belly pan plastic
        by Danny Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  4) A123 Automotive Propulsion Battery
        by "Roy LeMeur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  5) Re: A123 Automotive Propulsion Battery
        by Bill Dube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  6) Re: A123 Automotive Propulsion Battery
        by "Roy LeMeur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  7) 10,0000 cycles (was: Battery chart for a hand-out...)
        by Bill Dube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  8) AGNS Joins 100 MPH Club-Sets New NEDRA record
        by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  9) Re: direct drive or transmission?
        by "George Swartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 10) Re: AGNS Joins 100 MPH Club-Sets New NEDRA record
        by "Roy LeMeur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 11) Re: belly pan plastic
        by DM3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 12) Re: belly pan plastic
        by "Roy LeMeur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 13) Re: A123 Automotive Propulsion Battery
        by Marc Geller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 14) Electropolitan smokes tire, misses record
        by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 15) Re: belly pan plastic
        by John Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 16) Re: Dead start acceleration issues 
        by Bob Bath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 17) Re: 92 Civvy gets a refurb!  (parts leftover, anyone?)
        by "Marty Hewes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Begin Message --- Images: Man walking, riding a horse, driving a Model A, driving an SUV, driving an EV (plug hanging out)

Text:  EVolve.  Drive electric


----- Original Message ----- From: "Brandon Kruger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "EV list" <ev@listproc.sjsu.edu>
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2007 3:54 PM
Subject: EV Merchandise


Hey everyone,

I've noticed when I looked around I couldn't find a lot of good t-shirts and
other merchandise to promote EVs.  So I decided I'd see if I could offer
some to the community.  I've put together a small store where you can buy
merchandise to show off your support of EVs.  If you have any
recommendations or suggestions for what you would want, feel free to reply
or email me.

http://www.cafepress.com/altfuel

Happy shopping!

Brandon Kruger

P.S. I don't mean to be spamming or trolling or anything. If you consider
this message to be spam, I apologize.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.1/805 - Release Date: 5/15/2007 10:47 AM
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*         ---REMAINDER OF MESSAGE TRUNCATED---            *
*     This post contains a forbidden message format       *
*  (such as an attached file, a v-card, HTML formatting)  *
*       Lists at  sjsu.edu only accept PLAIN TEXT         *
* If your postings display this message your mail program *
* is not set to send PLAIN TEXT ONLY and needs adjusting  *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hey it's "strong", don't get me wrong.

It IS breakable however, particularly in thinner pieces. "bulletproof" Lexan (polycarbonate) is not only very thick but I think it's a different grade. Hit it hard with a hammer and it breaks easily enough. In fact the way you usually cut a flat sheet is just score it and hit it.

Back when the Battlebots show was in its "awesome" phase, a number of people thought Lexan was a strong housing. It looked neat! But that stuff just breaks to pieces under that sort of beating. Lots and lots of pieces actually.

On the other hand, I can hand you a piece of 1/8" UHMW-PE, a 5 pound sledgehammer, and a concrete sidewalk and the only loser's going to be the sidewalk. A piece of Coroplast (please stop calling it "Chloroplast", it hurts my eyes) will be flattened, but probably still not be broken into separate pieces.

It's partly a tradeoff of stiffness to impact resistance. For example, try to break a t-shirt with a sledgehammer. Unless you hang it from a tree and tear it down with the hammer, probably can't be done. But cloth has no stiffness thus serves no useful function as a belly liner. Lexan has more stiffness than we require. There are exceptions- UHMW-PE has fairly high stiffness but no way can it be broken.

I worry about 2 other factors. One, a car frame flexes. I don't know how significantly. Varies by vehicle and road stress I'm sure. I worry about the stress around the attachment points. This is also a case where a stiffer material may be bad.

Second is water. Vehicles are designed to drain under the frame, since water leaks in past the hood and such or from water off the road. A few well-placed holes SHOULD drain it but I'd worry a little bit that it may build up. Actually flat, unribbed surfaces with LOW stiffness are the worst since they tend to sag under the weight, making water collect in a new location that only sags more and increases in volume. Hopefully just putting a little hole there will get rid of that problem though.

Danny

David Roden wrote:

On 16 May 2007 at 7:11, Phil Marino wrote:

Polycarbonate has very high impact resistance.  ...
police riot face shields ... motorcycle helmets ...

And the front bumper of the ill-fated Sebring Zzipper EV.


David Roden - Akron, Ohio, USA
EV List Administrator

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Want to unsubscribe, stop the EV list mail while you're on vacation,
or switch to digest mode?  See how: http://www.evdl.org/help/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Note: mail sent to "evpost" or "etpost" addresses will not reach me. To send a private message, please obtain my email address from
the webpage http://www.evdl.org/help/ .
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Folks

I am not sure if "A123 Automotive Propulsion Battery" is the correct name, but somehow the EVDL has missed this (to me) major announcement.

(yes, I looked back thru recent postings)

Someone else _has_ mentioned it, here is his post-
~~~~~~~~~~~~
article: A123 announces PHEV auto-class battery system

Paul Wujek wrote:
May 16
I think that a few people on the list will find this interesting:
http://tyler.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2007/5/16/2953846.html
~~~~~~~~~~~

Ok... now here is a post I forwarded from the OEVA list to the SEVA list-
~~~~~~~~~~~~

[seva] FW: [Oeva-list] A123Systems makes Automotive


Yes, I know this subject has already been posted here. But I thought it needed a little more flag waving. Like... " Hey! Look over here!"

Just a tease from the manufacturer here-
http://www.a123systems.com/newsite/index.php#/products/cells32series/


Roy
~~~~~~~~~

                From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Oeva-list] A123Systems makes Automotive
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 15:12:15 EDT


Daniel

They would work for an EV they have two different mixes depending if it is a
HEV or a PHEV.

Going by their prices and others I would not expect any pack to cost below
15,000 for a very small one or 30,000 or more for what most of us would want. Then of course there is the problem of buying them and a BMS. They are really
looking for OEM buyers that would be buying very large quantities.

Don

In a message dated 5/19/2007 12:02:36 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Send  Oeva-list mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,  visit
http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list
or,  via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list  at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit  your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Oeva-list  digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. Re: Oeva-list  Digest, Vol 43, Issue 14 (Daniel  Eyk)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message:  1
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 11:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Daniel Eyk  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Oeva-list] Oeva-list Digest, Vol  43, Issue 14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

It sounds like these would not work for  an EV, is that
correct? Just for reference, do you have any idea  what
the cost per cell is? Dan Eyk


---  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Send Oeva-list mailing list  submissions to
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To  subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
visit
http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list
or, via email,  send a message with subject or body
'help' to
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing  the list at
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
is more  specific
than "Re: Contents of Oeva-list digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. A123Systems makes  Automotive Class Lithium Ion
Cells
       ([EMAIL PROTECTED])



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 23:33:04 -0700
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Oeva-list] A123Systems makes  Automotive
Class Lithium Ion
    Cells
To:  OEVA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID:


<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"



http://www.a123systems.com/newsite/index.php#/products/cells32series/

"These two cells, designed for HEV and PHEV
applications  offer extremely low
cost per Watt and Watt-hour,  respectively...."
-------------- next part --------------
An  HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:

/pipermail/attachments/20070517/63c12a15/attachment-0001.html


------------------------------

 _______________________________________________
Oeva-list mailing  list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list


End  of Oeva-list Digest, Vol 43, Issue 14
 *****************************************



Daniel  Eyk
Vancouver, Wa.

Electric S-10 project
E-15  project
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




Roy LeMeur

_________________________________________________________________
PC Magazine’s 2007 editors’ choice for best Web mail—award-winning Windows Live Hotmail. http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_pcmag_0507
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
They _just_ did a revamp of the whole website with all the latest news.

I get information about high-power stuff, but I am not in the loop for the rest of what they do.

These "Ultra" cells are quite exciting. They will have significantly higher specific power than the present cells. They will also be larger. The KillaCycle is slated to get these ultra cells when they begin production. We are really excited about this. (Who wouldn't be?)

Just reading the web page, it appears to be that they are making two types of new cells (news to me.) One looks to be high power (I know about this one.) The other appears to be high energy content. (News to me.)

        Bill Dube'


At 04:40 PM 5/19/2007, you wrote:
Hi Folks

I am not sure if "A123 Automotive Propulsion Battery" is the correct name, but somehow the EVDL has missed this (to me) major announcement.

(yes, I looked back thru recent postings)

Someone else _has_ mentioned it, here is his post-
~~~~~~~~~~~~
article: A123 announces PHEV auto-class battery system

Paul Wujek wrote:
May 16
I think that a few people on the list will find this interesting:
http://tyler.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2007/5/16/2953846.html
~~~~~~~~~~~

Ok... now here is a post I forwarded from the OEVA list to the SEVA list-
~~~~~~~~~~~~

[seva] FW: [Oeva-list] A123Systems makes Automotive


Yes, I know this subject has already been posted here. But I thought it needed a little more flag waving. Like... " Hey! Look over here!"

Just a tease from the manufacturer here-
http://www.a123systems.com/newsite/index.php#/products/cells32series/


Roy
~~~~~~~~~

                From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Oeva-list] A123Systems makes Automotive
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 15:12:15 EDT


Daniel

They would work for an EV they have two different mixes depending if it is
a
HEV or a PHEV.

Going by their prices and others I would not expect any pack to cost below
15,000 for a very small one or 30,000 or more for what most of us would want.
Then of course there is the problem of buying them and a BMS. They are really
looking for OEM buyers that would be buying very large quantities.

Don

In a message dated 5/19/2007 12:02:36 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Send  Oeva-list mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,  visit
http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list
or,  via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list  at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit  your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Oeva-list  digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. Re: Oeva-list  Digest, Vol 43, Issue 14 (Daniel  Eyk)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message:  1
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 11:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Daniel Eyk  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Oeva-list] Oeva-list Digest, Vol  43, Issue 14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

It sounds like these would not work for  an EV, is that
correct? Just for reference, do you have any idea  what
the cost per cell is? Dan Eyk


---  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Send Oeva-list mailing list  submissions to
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To  subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
visit
http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list
or, via email,  send a message with subject or body
'help' to
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing  the list at
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
is more  specific
than "Re: Contents of Oeva-list digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. A123Systems makes  Automotive Class Lithium Ion
Cells
       ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 23:33:04 -0700
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Oeva-list] A123Systems makes  Automotive
Class Lithium Ion
    Cells
To:  OEVA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID:

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"


http://www.a123systems.com/newsite/index.php#/products/cells32series/

"These two cells, designed for HEV and PHEV
applications  offer extremely low
cost per Watt and Watt-hour,  respectively...."
-------------- next part --------------
An  HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
/pipermail/attachments/20070517/63c12a15/attachment-0001.html


------------------------------

 _______________________________________________
Oeva-list mailing  list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list


End  of Oeva-list Digest, Vol 43, Issue 14
 *****************************************


Daniel  Eyk
Vancouver, Wa.

Electric S-10 project
E-15  project
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




Roy LeMeur

_________________________________________________________________
PC Magazine’s 2007 editors’ choice for best Web mail—award-winning Windows Live Hotmail. http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_pcmag_0507

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Bill Dube' wrote:
I get information about high-power stuff, but I
am not in the loop for the rest of what they do.

Bill-
I _did_ look first in the EVDL archives before posting expecting to see a post that I had missed with your name on it.

Here is the press release-
~~~~~~~~~~~
A123Systems Introduces 32-Series Automotive Class Lithium Ion™ Application-Specific Cells at the Advanced Automotive Battery Conference

Cells Optimized for Use in Hybrid and Plug-In Hybrid Applications Offer Industry-Leading Price-Performance

Long Beach, Calif. - Advanced Automotive Battery Conference (AABC) - May 16, 2007 - A123Systems, developer and producer of state-of-the-art Automotive Class Lithium Ion batteries, today introduced its 32-series cells, specifically designed for Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) and Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV) use. These batteries provide unprecedented specific power, safety and abuse-tolerance and leverage the company’s existing low-cost, high-volume manufacturing techniques to offer the electric drive industry a new level of price-performance.

A123Systems’ 32-series lineup is currently comprised of two cells with custom Nanophosphate™ electrode designs, based on the same proven chemistry as the mass produced ANR26650M1 cell: the 32113 M1Ultra and 32157 M1HD.

The 32113 M1Ultra high power cells are optimized to offer industry leading power by volume and cost-per-watt. Designed to meet the rigorous requirements of HEV applications, the 32113 is currently designed into A123Systems’ programs with major U.S. and European auto manufacturers. The 32157 M1HD cell uses a higher energy electrode design, geared specifically for PHEVs, and offers greater volumetric energy density and the lowest cost per watt-hour. Currently used in a Saturn Vue PHEV development program, the 32157 offers superior calendar and cycle life at high depth-of-discharge (DOD), as well as excellent power density for charge-sustaining operation.

Unlike conventional lithium ion cells that compromise critical parameters to meet system requirements, A123Systems’ Automotive Class Lithium Ion cells are optimized to offer power, safety and life, all at price-performance targets that enable the industry. Wide power availability over a broad range of state-of-charge as well as exceptional endurance implies that systems with both cells require minimal oversizing, allowing for lower overall systems cost.

"Our 32-series cells provide high performance and abuse-tolerance unmatched by any other lithium ion battery chemistry," said David Vieau, president and CEO, A123Systems. "By making it possible for manufacturers to design HEVs and PHEVs with attractive performance, reliability and safety as well as an overall lower systems cost, we are able to play a significant role in speeding the market’s acceptance of highly fuel efficient vehicles."

Critical to the adoption of lithium ion batteries in automotive applications, the 32-series cells are designed with abuse-tolerance in mind. A123Systems’ Automotive Class Lithium Ion cells take advantage of lessons learned from the mass-production of ANR26650M1 cells in order to deliver 10+ year and 150,000 mile projected life requirements in engineered automotive battery packs.

A123Systems’ Nanophosphate chemistry has been developed with the assistance of the Department of Energy FreedomCAR program and is a result of more than $102 million in private investment. With performance validated by various national labs and leading automotive OEMs, the A123Systems doped Nanophosphate batteries achieve the superior durability and safety required for automotive use of lithium ion technology.

About A123Systemsz
A123Systems has quickly become one of the world’s leading suppliers of high-power lithium-ion batteries. Based on the company’s patent pending Nanophosphate technology, the batteries deliver previously unattainable levels of power, safety and life. Applicable to a wide range of industries, A123Systems’ products allow OEMs expanded flexibility in system design, removing many traditional technology constraints. Currently, the Company sells millions of battery cells to Black and Decker and Dewalt for use in the most advanced handheld power tools available on the market today. Founded in 2001, A123Systems’ proprietary nanoscale electrode technology is built on initial developments from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. For additional information please visit www.a123systems.com.



~~~~~~


Roy LeMeur

_________________________________________________________________
More photos, more messages, more storage—get 2GB with Windows Live Hotmail. http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_2G_0507
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Here is the cycle life info on their new website:

http://www.a123systems.com/newsite/index.php#/applications/phev/pchart2/

Notice that it is a straight line for % capacity remaining versus cycles. As I mentioned earlier, if 50% remaining capacity is OK with you, then the cycle life is 10,000 cycles.

Like I said, I don't just make this stuff up. :-)

Many (perhaps most) of the battery manufacturers use 50% remaining capacity for the "end" of the cycle life.

        Bill Dube'

At 07:53 PM 5/17/2007, you wrote:
You need to dust off your calculator and actually do the math.

At 50% capacity loss (10 times 5%) you will get 10,000 cycles (10 times 1,000.) This is direct quote from the engineers a A123 Systems. I don't make this stuff up.

By the way, can you find another brand of battery that lists the cycle life for 10 C discharge?

At 08:33 PM 5/17/2007, you wrote:
What that chart shows:

  1C the loss is 5% at 25C  after 1000 cycles
  2C the loss is 10% at 45C
  2C the loss is 20% at 60C

All I can really say is you are now Bill the Battery Salesman
to say expect 10,000 cycles for an EV.

Jack Murray

Bill Dube wrote:
As I mentioned in a post yesterday, (in answer to YOUR post) the temperature is what really matters in the cycle life. The high-current cycle tests makes the cells run at high temperatures, and thus shorten cycle life.
If you look at the chart
http://www.a123systems.com/newsite/pdf/ANR26650M1_Datasheet_FEB2007-1.pdf
you will notice that the 25 C curve indicates a 5% capacity loss after 1,000 cycles. (This is what you would expect in the typical EV environment.) Looking at the 60 C curve, you see that the capacity loss is about 25%. after 1,000 cycles. At the same current, but at 45 C, the curve shows about 12% loss after 1,000 cycles. EVs typically discharge batteries at 1C, sometimes less, sometimes a bit more. Low internal resistance keeps the cell temperature at 30 C or below. Thus, in an EV, you can expect the cycle life of about 10,000 cycles to 50% capacity. Why don't you dig up the cycle life of an Optima at 10 C discharge at 60 C? You can't find this chart because the battery would be a puddle of smoking molten goo at this temperature.
Bill Dube'

At 06:49 PM 5/17/2007, you wrote:

So the chart that A123 publishes that shows 20% loss at 1000 cycles at 10C discharge is not correct?


Bill Dube wrote:

The cycle life on A123 Systems cells is actually much more than 1,000 cycles, if you rate it the same way other manufacturers' do. The 1,000 rating is for just 5% loss of capacity. If you rate it to 50% loss of capacity, (like lead-acid AGMs are rated) the cycle life is 10,000 cycles. I don't think Li-Ion FePo has a calender capacity loss like conventional Li-Ion does. The chemistry is much more stable.
Bill Dube'

At 05:35 PM 5/17/2007, you wrote:

I'm manning a booth at the Maker Faire (San Mateo County Fairgrounds, May
19-20, http://www.makerfaire.com ) over the weekend and wanted to give a
hand-out regarding EVs. In addition to some white papers by Tesla, I wanted
to put together two charts.

The first one, I was hoping to put gas price over time, vs battery cost over time. Does anyone know where I'd get data for battery cost? Say, for NiMH
and LiIon, over the past 10 years or so?

The second one was inspired by
http://www.madkatz.com/ev/batteryTechnologyComparison.html
and it's a chart of battery specs, with an added emphasis on total cost of
the battery, per kilowatt-hour, over the lifetime of the battery.
Here it
is so far... does anyone have good info on what a modern NiCad would be to
use?  Anyone had experience (and pricing) with Valence's U-Charge?
Also,
what's the realistic peak power out of a flooded lead-acid or hawker
Genesis?  (I figure the racers on this list would know for real...)

Tech               Density     #Cycles Discharge   Cost
Wh/kg W/kg (per month) $/kWh $/kW $/LifeTimekWh
Est Range
Flooded lead-acid  47             600     20%?      $85           $0.14
"AGM" lead-acid    35     412?    500      5%?     $145   $12?
$0.29       ~60
NiCad              50?           2000?   100%?     $300?          $0.15
NiMH (Nilar)       55     385    4000              $960  $137
$0.24       ~110
LiIon (18650)     176     631     500     ??%      $535  $149
$1.07       ~250
LiPho (A123)      110    3000    1000*            $1300   $47
$1.30       ~180

Notes:
LiIon loses 5% of capacity per year, regardless of whether you use it. See
http://www.buchmann.ca/Article5-Page1.asp
NiCads have severe memory effects.

W/kg is max possible "peak" rate.
Wh/kg is "average" or "nominal" discharge rate.
Range is affected by how much extra packaging must surround the battery, for
example extra temperature monitoring that affects 18650 cells.
18650 cells est. at $5 each
* - cycles claimed by A123

Sources:

http://www.nilar.com/index.php?pageID=33&languageID=1
NiMH based on Nilar 24V 9AHr=216WHr @3.9kg $208 each

http://www.madkatz.com/ev/batteryTechnologyComparison.html

http://www.teslamotors.com/display_data/TeslaRoadsterBatterySystem.pdf
 =>  56kWH, 200kW, 200 miles, 375V, 450kg (317kg batt weight est)
6,831 cells, 46.5g each at $5 each would be $34,150 for  56kWHr

http://libattery.ustc.edu.cn/english/introduction%203.htm

Flooded specs based on US Battery US185 spec 195AHr=2340WHr @49kg $200

AGM Specs based on Hawker G70EP 72AHr=864WHr @24.9kg $125

A123 specs based on 3.3V, 2.3Ah, 7.6WHr @70g $10.00 (dev kits are $20 each
in much smaller quantity)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- On what was supposed to be a nice sunny day in Thompson Ohio The Lawless Industries AGNS bike and crew were looking for 4-5 good runs and a shot at both the NEDRA 144 volt motorcycle record and the 100 MPH club. Well unexpected rain put a damper on the fire but not until 2 runs were in the books. Run # 1 flashed on the board as a 12.92 @ 102 MPH. AGNS is in the club! An hr. later we got a chance to back it up. Run #2 showed the 12 old Hawkers were starting to come alive. 12.67 @ 106 MPH. I believe that since these are more than 1% apart that the slower time of 12.92 will stand as the new NEDRA record. We started having visions of the 11's and 110+. We saw the rain coming but since the batteries were getting into their temperature comfort zone we went ahead and charged ole AGNS till she couldn't take any more. It wasn't meant to be. The rain came and we departed for a victory dinner, leaving behind a whole group of folks scratching their heads over how a silent little minibike can stay darn near a tricked up Hayabusa for half a track and keeps gets quicker and quicker every single run. Next stop 125 MPH Club. I cannot explain how much darn fun this little bike has become.

Dear Mr. Rudman, per your comments of a few days ago... AGNS will be at the track on Wednesday with sights on the 168 volt record of 12.49 @ 100 MPH. Prepare to eat your hat.

Shawn Lawless
________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Its probably been mentioned already, but the major disadvantage to a low RPM 
wheel motor is the detrimental effect it has of adding to unsprung weight.  
This makes the suspension more difficult to stabilize for handling and 
vehicle control.  Most wheel motor designs I have seen use at least a 
planetary gear reduction, so they are not "direct drive" per the popular 
definition on this web site.  

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

Wow! Congratulations Shawn!

Hey Plasma Boy! Are you listening? This little bike is coming closer to your MPHs and ETs. (@144V)

Can't wait to see what the other Lawless Industries vehicles will do.

"The records are dropping like flies in the face of Lawless Industries"

No charge for the plug  :^D
~~~~~~


Roy LeMeur

_________________________________________________________________
More photos, more messages, more storage—get 2GB with Windows Live Hotmail. http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_2G_0507
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
As i mentioned previously I used PVC sheet as a belly pan.  I used it on the 
Karmann GhiLectric
and it made a considerable difference in aerodynamics and wind noise.  One word 
of caution, make
sure not to cover the lift points (where you jack up the car).  It is best to 
cut out a small
section to expose these areas if it is necessary to cover the area around them. 
One good feature
is it keeps the underside of the car much cleaner and helps to deflect any 
foriegn objects on the
road from causing any damage to otherwise exposed areas.  I will try to take 
some pictures and
post them on the site.
http://www.dm3electrics.com/
mario


> > Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 14:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Bruce Weisenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: belly pan plastic
> To: ev@listproc.sjsu.edu
> 
> I am tired of deleting theses emails on belly pan
> plastic. 
> Choroplastic is being used by folks trying to get the
> best Gas mileage possible. The biggest reason for a
> belly pan is to reduce air drag or to make a vehicle
> more aerodynamic. 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Wow.

I am counting 37 posts on "belly pan plastic"

The EVDL _is_ getting busy recently (can you say $4 per gallon?)

FWIW, Coroplast is used for everything. Look at the sign materials when you park at the convenience store.

Cheaper than dirt, (almost) you can dumpster dive it.

Strength to weight to cost no brainer.

Plastic Corrugated Cardboard.

Try it, you will like it.

Pyrophobia types? I can't help you.

Can we stop now?
~~~~~~


Roy LeMeur

_________________________________________________________________
Make every IM count. Download Messenger and join the i’m Initiative now. It’s free. http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=TAGHM_MAY07
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Marty Hewes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <ev@listproc.sjsu.edu>
Subject: Re: 92 Civvy gets a refurb!  (parts leftover, anyone?)
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 21:42:08 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        format=flowed;
        charset="iso-8859-1";
        reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Are you sure that's a problem?  I know nothing about E-meters, but the 
difference between 1.059 and 1.067 megs is less than 1%.  Most meters aren't 
that good, much less most electronics.

Marty
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Bath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <ev@listproc.sjsu.edu>
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2007 5:44 PM
Subject: 92 Civvy gets a refurb! (parts leftover, anyone?)


Well, the good news is that I finally took off the
dash for the first time since completing the
conversion, and yanked the e-meter from its' little
hole where the side-view mirror motor controls _would_
be mounted in an LX or EX model-- and put it into a
"pod pillar."  It's much more visible now.
   Another thing I did was to install a Belktronix
DCDC converter.  That means 60A of 12V, not 30.
SWEET, since my aux. battery is the wimpiest size.
That leaves a leftover DCP DCDC 350watt converter, now
listed on the EVTrading Post.  It works _perfectly_.

   But without the extra 12V _bipolar supply_ from the
DCP DCDC to the E-meter, I also installed a Belktronix
E-meter supply.  And here is where it takes a poor
turn: I miswired the meter just enough to (what I'm
fairly certain is) damage the prescaler.  It's
supposed to read 1.059 megs between in hot and out
hot, and mine is reading 1.067 megs.  There is some
diode test too, but I haven't done that.  I bought a
new one, and it works fine.  Sooo if someone wants to
pay postage and gamble that they can melt the potting
compound, or somehow alter/repair the prescaler, it's
free except for the postage.
   How cool to finally have digital current Ah,
voltage, etc. readings even when the car is _off_
now!!
   Gotta' go drive summore!!!

Converting a gen. 5 Honda Civic?  My $20 video/DVD
has my '92 sedan, as well as a del Sol and hatch too!
Learn more at:
www.budget.net/~bbath/CivicWithACord.html
  ____
                     __/__|__\ __
  =D-------/    -  -         \
                     'O'-----'O'-'
Would you still drive your car if the tailpipe came out of the steering 
wheel? Are you saving any gas for your kids?



____________________________________________________________________________________
Finding fabulous fares is fun.
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and 
hotel bargains.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to