On 21/06/2017 4:03 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 12:15:31PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 19/06/2017 10:23 am, Russell Standish wrote:
I know Scott wouldn't go as far as me. For me, all such irreversible
processes are related to conscious entities in some way. Whilst
agreeing that Geiger counters are unlikely to be conscious, I would
say that the output of Geiger counter is not actually discrete until
observed by a conscious experimenter.
That sounds remarkably like the "many minds" interpretation of
quantum mechanics. This is disfavoured by most scientists because it
leaves the physics of the billions of years before the emergence of
the first "conscious" creature unresolved -- the first consciousness
would cause an almighty collapse on the many minds reading.

Each consciousness causes "an almighty collapse" in er own mind
independently of any other. It's a pure 1p phenomena.

It is actually a 3p phenomenon because there is inter-subjective agreement about the fact that measurements give definite results.

There is no collapse at all at the 3p level, nor even decoherence as such.

Decoherence is a well-understood physical phenomenon that has been widely observed. I do not know what you mean by saying "nor even decoherence as such." Also, you seem to be confusing the inter-subjective 3p view with Tegmark's bird view. There is no person, body, or consciousness that ever has the bird view -- the bird is a purely formal construct and has nothing to do with mind or consciousness. Even though everything might remain unitary at that level, no one can ever experience the consequences of that unitary evolution.

Bruce

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to