Hi Pierz,
On 21 Jun 2017, at 15:31, Pierz wrote:
Bruno, do you believe there is a different world for every possible
basis in which a spin (or other observable) might be measured? That
seems pretty strange.
I believe in 0 worlds, but in many relative computational histories,
in arithmetic. Linearity at the bottom ensures that the experiences
will not depend on the basis chosen for the "universe", but the
stories guides the consciousness flux, say, toward stable sharable
and hopefully sustainable realilties.
Do those dreams cohere enough to define well determined physical
world? That is just a complex question which would need some progress
in the definition of what could be a physical world.
For QM, I use a multi-multiverse, choosing a base, is choosing a
multiverse, (I have called that a partition of the multiverse, also).
Wallace things similar, I think, but I would say it literally follow
from how Everett explains it it seems to me; notably where he explains
the base independence of the many realities.
The global system has no "well defined " subsystems, but the sub-
systems themsemselve beg to disagree on this, and can locally see
themselves as part of some subsystem of a larger system.
Keep in mind I do not assume QM in physics, but digital mechanism in
the "mind science".
The wave seems to work, and the question is where do that wave come
from? I suspect already the prime numbers, but there is is only one
way that I know to get both the quanta and the qualia, which is the
"interview of the (Löbian-Gödelian) machine (using Solovay G/G*
theorem).
If the prime numbers are "guilty", then I guess RH is undecidable in
PA (and thus true, as even RA can refute RH if RH is false!). Maybe
the metamathematics could recover the qualia from this, I don't know.
Bruno
On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 10:27:14 PM UTC+10, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
On 20 Jun 2017, at 19:44, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 6/19/2017 11:47 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Why would you say that if I fly from Bermuda to London it
demonstrates that flights from Bermuda to Algiers and Algiers to
London exist?
Why should I not when I can find interference pattern involving
Algiers and some other city? It is the interference which forces us
to take "the two slit" into account, even with only one photon used
in the process?
It's fine to use some other basis. We use the "two slit" basis
because that makes the calculations easy.
Yes, but it can be misleading for those who have a naive reading of
the MW. The relevant (for the experience and their relative weigh)
part of the multiverse is base independent (eventually it is even
"theory" independent).
But that's not a reason to say each path is in a different world;
PARTICULARY since they interfere with one another.
That is why I usually avoid the term "world". "Many-dreams" is less
wrong, and it makes physics looking already closer to the digital
mechanist (non computable) physics.
Bruno
Brent
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
