On Wednesday 23 July 2008 12:06:58 pm Christoph Doerbeck wrote: > Hi Jarod, > > We need to figure out how to package an older version of jack for fedora > with ffado support enabled. From a previous conversation I've had: > > "I've put up a modified version of jack 0.106.0 (aka 'the last know > good') that includes the most recent firewire backend at: > http://subversion.ffado.org/attachment/wiki/DevelopmentReleases/jack-audio- >connection-kit-0.106.99.tar.gz?format=raw > > I think it's a good idea to use that for packaging. Anything post > 0.106.0 has too many issues, and there is no real need for more testing > of these problems. We've fixed some of them, but there are still some > well-described test cases that fail consistently. I can personally > confirm that the current SVN is not workable. > "
Crud. This is gonna be messy, if it can be done at all. Given that Fedora is at 0.109.2 already, we'd have a hard time talking the maintainer into using that build, so we'd be looking at a compat package or an ffado-jackd package or something along those lines. :\ For grins, I started poking at a local build of it (simply as jack) here. At the moment, its falling down like so: [...] gcc -shared .libs/alsa_driver.o .libs/generic_hw.o .libs/memops.o .libs/hammerfall.o .libs/hdsp.o .libs/ice1712.o .libs/usx2y.o -Wl,--whole-archive ../alsa-midi/.libs/libalsamidi.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive -lasound -lm -lpthread -ldl -m64 -mtune=generic -m64 -mtune=generic -Wl,-soname -Wl,jack_alsa.so -o .libs/jack_alsa.so /usr/bin/ld: ../alsa-midi/.libs/libalsamidi.a(alsa_seqmidi.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC ../alsa-midi/.libs/libalsamidi.a(alsa_seqmidi.o): could not read symbols: Bad value Might be some requirements on an older ALSA as well, I dunno... > On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 23:28 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > So tonight, I finally spent some time hacking on ffado and a spec file > > for it... Got it building, and even at least basically working... > > (ffadomixer sees my device, that's as far as I got, ship it!). I've > > submitted it for Fedora package review: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456353 > > > > Reviewers would be greatly appreciated... Even more so if you actually > > know how to use this stuff (I have no clue myself :). -- Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Fedora-music-list mailing list Fedora-music-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list
