On Wednesday, July 17, 2002, at 10:57 AM, Max Horn wrote: >> >> It doesn't? Sure, its a version behind, but i thought the fink policy >> was NOT to depend on fink zlib at all because it is not needed and >> just there for backward compatibility for old packages. > > I am not sure what you are refering to, Ben. Nor do I understand what > exactly you want to say, but let me restate what I meant in my previous > post:
I thought it was pretty clear, if you read the whole message. > > > zlib binaries are part of OS X 10.1 and later. However, header files > are not (check out /usr/include yourself). Hence Fink has to provide I did. Did you? > header files. We also do provide the lib for backward compatibility (as > in 10.0, there was no zlib in the system), however note that there is > no /sw/lib/libz.dylib, hence applications will use the headers from > Fink but the library from /usr/lib. > Erm, I pasted the headers in the email message. I HAVE THE HEADERS on this 10.1.5 system: [lsanca1-ar8-4-60-073-020:/usr/include] ben% ls -la zconf.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 7903 Sep 2 2001 zconf.h [lsanca1-ar8-4-60-073-020:/usr/include] ben% ls -la zlib.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 40898 Sep 2 2001 zlib.h So where did they come from? These are the same headers that are in the .deb file, as I posted before. They are in /usr/include on both my April and December dev tools partitions. -Ben ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
