On 19-11-2012 14:39, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> >> Are there any suggestions what I should try to do next? We have actually 2 >> similar servers, both running 2.5.1SC (for now). The other server COULD be >> equipped with CS instead, if that would make a lot of sence as a trial. Even >> SS, as it primarily serves a lot of different databases with only a few >> connections on each. >> >> Your call, Alex :) > > If 8 cores are not 100% loaded, this becomes more windows + amd rather > than firebird issue. I give up. > >
What was being tested? There may be no sense to load all cores and let them wait for disk IO. Or was the benchmark done with something pure CPU-bound (a stored procedure doing math in a loop, for example)? Adriano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
