06.05.2017 15:15, livius wrote: > >> Yes, but we should avoid to write whole novels at SQL statements ;) > > Agree - but to fast chice is also not good
Could you offer better syntax ? >> It have no sence (if i understand you :) ) > Maybe, but it should be prohibited in code or designed to do not create > wrong behavior I prefer second when possible. And this is one more reason for explicitly export transaction snapshot. > You know if something is possible someone use it > and i mean: > base transaction > transaction 2 share base transaction > transaction 3 share base transaction > and someone try > transaction 4 share e.g. transaction 2 ;-) in this point it should share > base or do not alow it > but maybe heare are not any problem? So far, I see no problem (except of strange coding\design of such user application). Also, we could disable to export and import snapshots at the same time and it will make such cases impossible. I offer to go this way. Regards, Vlad ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
