On 03/09/2021 09:36, Mike Kaganski wrote: > On 03.09.2021 15:29, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >> On 03/09/2021 07:24, Mike Kaganski wrote: >>> >>>> vcruntime140d.dll!00007ffa0f4a1a29() >>>> Engine12.dll!Jrd::Sort::diddleKey(unsigned char * record, bool >>>> direction) Line 916 >>>> at >>>> C:\lo\src\build\workdir\UnpackedTarball\firebird\src\jrd\sort.cpp(916) >>>> Engine12.dll!Jrd::Sort::sortBuffer(Jrd::thread_db * tdbb) Line 1998 >>>> at >> >> What is odd is that this seems the last pass, where duplicates are >> verified. >> >> So diddleKey was already called many times for the present data. >> >> When you tested vanilla Firebird, did you get it already built or did >> you compiled it with same tools used to compile OO-Firebird? > > First I experimented with the release downloaded from > https://firebirdsql.org/en/firebird-3-0-7/, so it was an "already > built". But then I tried to build it myself from git repo (as I > described in the original message); it turned out that it's impossible > to build FB using official instructions ( > https://www.firebirdsql.org/en/building-the-code-windows/ ) using the > same tools as LO uses: LO uses VS2019 (and builds FB 3.0.7), while FB > current requires at most VS2017. So of course it was comparing apples to > oranges, I realize :) > >
Did you have OO-built isql.exe? Did you tested OO-built tools outside OO (with ISQL)? If you not have OO-built isql.exe, maybe you can mix OO-FB DLLs with FB tools so you can test OO-built engine12.dll with isql? What I do want to know is that if OO engine12.dll may have some bug due to the different compiler used. Adriano Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
