Franck,

I appreciate your respons. When you say Remote Objects/Flex Data
Services provides the most advanced way of interoperating with the
backend, what specifically is possible?

What are the capabilities that I would get leveraging Remote
Objects/Flex Data Services that I would not get (or would be difficult
to implement) with Web services or HTTP services. If there are
resources on the Adobe site that spell this out, please point me to them.

Since we are looking at the different possibilities and we have
somewhat of a blank slate, the more I can go into this with open eyes
the better. I appreciate everyone who responded being willing to guide
someone new to this architecture.

Thanks,
Bob



--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Franck de Bruijn"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Flex is supposed to be backend independent. So you should choose the
> technology you're most comfortable with.
> 
>  
> 
> There are in general 3 ways of integrating with your back-end:
> 
> *     webservices: total freedom, but can turn out to be hard. Especially
> with .Net there are some problems, although Adobe is working to fix
it. With
> Java/Axis, you'll probably find no issues.
> *     Remote Objects / Flex Data Services. The most advanced way of
> interoperating with your back-end, but requires JAVA on the backend.
> *     HTTP services: simple HTTP calls. For simple interfaces it will
> work, but for the more complex ones it will be insufficient.
> 
>  
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Franck
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of rhlarochelle
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 1:47 AM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Choice of backend systems - which provides best
> functionality
> 
>  
> 
> I am new to Flex 2, and have the opportunity to develop a new
> application. Given all of the choices of back end technology out there
> (J2EE, Coldfusion, PHP), which will provide for the richest user
> experience?
> 
> It seems that leveraging J2EE and Java gives the best potential for
> sharing objects (and updates to objects ) over the wire. Have I got
> this right?
>







--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to