My vote is to expend the programming effort on the new console and only consider the Multi-RX enhancements that are "low hanging fruit" for inclusion in the 1.x console.
-Tim --- Integrated Technical Services "Too much of everything is just enough." -Rob Barlow -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Wachsmann Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 12:37 PM To: 'A.R.S. - W5AMI'; flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Feature Request List The simple SubRX with same mode and filter was not too difficult to implement thanks to the facilities that Bob and Frank provided (a LONG time ago!). However, the code is nowhere near ready for individual modes/filters/other settings. And to add them would be a fair amount of work. I'll be honest....we may never have those options in this console. One of the major reasons for adopting the new architecture is to address this particular problem (data model -- removed from GUI). It is being built in such a way that this is no-brainer. To build it into the current console would be at least 2x work at best undoing our current source code data model. All of this is to say that you may have to wait until the new console for more Multi-RX functionality. Eric Wachsmann FlexRadio Systems > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > radio.biz] On Behalf Of A.R.S. - W5AMI > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 11:24 AM > To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz > Subject: [Flexradio] Feature Request List > > I noticed today that I can delete my requests in the "Feature Request" > system. Two requests I made a while back have been implemented on the > new SVN so I decided to delete them so not to clutter the request > list. I don't know if this is exactly the proper procedure. Being a > programmer myself, I know how version control, clutter and other > things can add to my confusion and daily hair pulling. > > Eric, would it help for us users to go back and delete these requests > we made if said request has been implemented? > > By the way, I am very pleased with the new sub rx and other things in > 683! Wonder if there is any way to allow cross mode listening. Say > AM on the main and LSB on the sub? I know, one thing at a time....;) > > > Brian w5ami > > _______________________________________________ > FlexRadio mailing list > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ > FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com _______________________________________________ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com _______________________________________________ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
