Curtis Olson wrote: > Here's the thing. FlightGear uses a gui widget set that is > implemented on top of OpenGL. This has many advantages from a > portability standpoint and from the standpoint of integrating with > window systems. "Pui" doesn't have every feature under the sun, but > it was never meant to. It's relatively small, lean, mean, and written > on top of OpenGL which makes life *much* easier for us. > > This is an area where simply writing an email with why the whole thing > "sucks" is completely worthless. If you know something about gui > systems, something about portability of code across all our supported > platforms, and something about flightgear. Then post a proposal for a > change. Better yet, post patches with a new gui system that doesn't > suck, runs efficiently, supports all platforms, integrates cleanly > with FlightGear, doesn't add a nightmare of new library dependencies, > isn't chock full of bugs, does everything the current system does, and > does everything you think a gui system should do, etc. etc. I think that what I'm looking for is behavior similar to QT http://qt.nokia.com/ which I user quite often.
I am sorry and apologize for using the word "sucks". pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
