Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Sorry to be annoying yet again, but that's what I'm best at:
* Erik Hofman -- Saturday 17 December 2005 10:48:
I must say I like the idea, but given it's current state (no windows
support) I would like to postpone it until after FlightGear 1.0 is released.
And I would like to postpone the 1.0 release, until FlightGear is ready
to be called 1.0.
What's this, now you want releases that have missing options for some
OS'es??
> Saving GUI states is one piece of that puzzle, as are
landing/taxi lights. There are no finished patches available for
Give me a patch and I'll commit it, until then there's little room for
discussion.
that yet? So? What keeps "us" from working on them and waiting until
they are finished? (No, I won't be working on that, but I'm also
not pressing for 1.0.)
I don't like the idea of FlightGear 0.9.9.1223 just because no one cared
to implement taxi lights. As a matter of fact I've seen several multi
million dollar simulators that didn't implement them, Why? Probably
because they're just eye-candy and add little to the simulator part of
the program.
I'm now sufficiently fed up with the secret 1.0 agenda, that I'll
stop contributing until after this monstrosity is out.
Lighten up, I just started looking at this patch since Fred promised to
fill in the missing gaps.
Erik
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
