On Thursday 17 August 2006 00:51, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > Ok, why?
>
> Because I like it and think it should be active by default. FlightGear
> aircraft are property of their creators -- they decide (as long as no
> "sacred" rules are violated). Everyone is free to modify his/her copy,
> to fork it, or even to create their own, better aircraft.
>From my point of view this is a total misfeature.
> We could use
> some more helicopters. What about you?! Any contribution around the
> corner?
Don't mix up independent things Mechior ...
> If there was a poll (which is not the case), then I would have to say:
> 5 people welcomed it. *Nobody* has complained about it so far. You didn't
> argue at all, just imply a "sacred rule" that doesn't exist. Mathias had
> the most ridiculous argument: the 100 rich guys with panorama or
> multi-screen setup, or head-trackers shouldn't have to turn it off. I'm
> very depressed and sad to cause this pain to that 0.0001% minority, and you
> can call me old-fashioned, but somehow I think that doing what I consider
> desirable for 99.9999% of users is right.
No, if you want to present flightgear in an environment where this stuff does
not make sense at all and where people expect a somehow well done and working
presentation, you don't want to additionally fiddle with that stuff.
But anyway can we have a maser switch to get rid of that once for ever in
every aircraft?
Greetings
Mathias
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
