Hi! Heiko Schulz wrote: > Nice to hear! > > So the developement goes on? So it get's more > userfriendly, and more independant of the platform?
We don't have a development plan yet. There are some things we'd like to adress in the near future such as interfacing to GDAL and OGR, but there are some more things on our mind that we might start working on. Essentially the basic workflow of TerraGear will probably stay the same due to the possibility of parallelisation for automatic scenery building, but we'll probably need some more finetuned interface if we want to implement instantaneous and local scenery rebuilds from mapserver.flightgear.org on submission of new local data. > I hope there is will be a healthy competeion between > terragear and fgsd! As far as I view the relationship between fgsd they are more complementary than competitors. TerraGear is clearly better suited for automatic rebuilding as we will need it based on the scenery database, while fgsd is more suited for local work. So we will clearly not focus our work on competing with fgsd. I have to stress that there might not be big movement straight ahead, but currently I have some spare time to work on some TerraGear extensions, so it was the time to establish the work environment. Cheers, Ralf ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
