On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:50:03 +0100, Gijs wrote in message <[email protected]>:
> Hi, > > > Scott wrote: > > To help discussion, I've tried to list all the contemporary > > "airliners" and give some idea of how much functionality (for > > flying) is implemented. > > > If we look at your status numbers, only the Concorde and 777-200ER > are considered to be fairly completed. As the concorde cannot be > considered as an "ordinary" airliner, I would vote for the 777-200ER, > once again. It is pretty common all around the world. ..what if we toss out the "ordinary airliner" idea and go with the Concorde as an "historical airliner"? It _is_ speedy sexy. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
