Something I'd love to see, in the long term, is a GUI that allows
users to customize their panels, just like real aircraft owners do. I
could decide to install a different brand of TC (the default late
1970s Cessna 172P now has a vintage 1950s needle and ball instead of a
TC -- cool, but what's up with that?), upgrade or downgrade the GPS,
swap out radios, etc.  That would be especially attractive for flight
schools and students, since they could match the panels of their
actual aircraft pretty closely.


All the best,


David

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Torsten Dreyer <tors...@t3r.de> wrote:
>> A Sigma-Tek attitude gyro, for example, looks and works pretty-much
>> the same as a primary instrument for a Cessna 150 or as a backup
>> instrument on a 747 -- the differences (such as different voltage for
>> the backlighting) are pretty trivial.  I'd hate to see 100 copies of
>> the same Sigma-Tek attitude gyro in the base package.
> What we probably need for shared instruments is a well defined set of
> properties for each instrument. Currently most of our instruments animations
> are tied directly to the output properties of the signal source. In vor.xml
> the TO-flag is animated from /instrumentation/nav[0]/to-flag. It's only usable
> for nav1 and a second set of animation xml is needed for nav2.  What we need
> are unique properties for each instrument that are responsible for the
> animation of the instrument on on side and unique properties that reflect some
> state (like a TO-flag signal) on the other side. What's left for the A/C
> designer is the linkage between these two side.
> When you buy the Sigma-Tek attitude gyro at you local avionics dealer (the
> base package), you get your device with a well known interface connector and
> your avionics technician (A/C designer) needs to do the wiring.
> Almost everything needed for that "three-tier-design" is already in fg.
> Probably we need some kind of "relative mount point", so a single vor.xml can
> be loaded (mounted) into /instrumentation/vor-indicator[0] and
> /instrumentation/vor-indicator[1].
>
> Torsten
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Flightgear-devel mailing list
> Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to