On 2010-12-01 15.18, Vivian Meazza wrote: > The point is that your rating system can't possibly pick this up. It is a > subjective opinion of the "attractiveness" of a cockpit. Or, as I said, a > beauty contest. This does have some value, and we certainly gain from > drawing attention to those models that have no, or only rudimentary, cockpit > interior details. > > Vivian
Can't we just accept Thorsten's list as a review? Just like films have reviewers and their taste might fit yours. Either you trust the film review or not, and follow the recommendation. After a while you find your favourite reviewers and know which ones actually have similar film taste as you, or even better, draws your attention to films that you might miss otherwise. The same goes with Thorsten's list, either you think the ratings are useful or not. Or better yet, create your own reviews based on more or less subject scores. I hope that Thorsten will keep his list up to date with the development of the different models ... and one day all models have a wow factor! As several others stated before me, I think the list is useful and I'll test a few of the higher ranked planes. Cheers, Jari ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
