Well - yes - I am rather disappointed Especially because i looked again, but cannot find any of my suggested improvements in the latest "getstart", in regards to structuring, referencing, and looks. In addition I did not really see an answer to Curtis question, that started that all - I get that kind of questions every week during my ATCing - and hoped I had an answer.
But as I said at the beginning: Our dev.group had done quite some job designing the "getstart" quite some time ago - which I thought I could contribute to, especially from a more USERs-viewpoint. But I surely will not set up a competitive environment against that basically good work. Just let me beg for one last wish: Please spend that now "getstart" at least a little cosmetic treatment! Somehow I do not believe that the pictures shown in it represent todays FlightGears possibilities, especially in regards to scenery! Look e.g. the title-picture - but also several others inside. (Yes - I know: The work that counts is the (hidden) engineering - but what sells it, is the (outside visible) marketing!). I will now complete my announced task to finalize the German translation, based on the "getstart". And I will keep the EN/version as is on my homepage - but will not provide a direct link to it for standard users. If anybody anytime wants to use it or parts of it for FlightGear - he is welcome to do so. I hope: No harm done joe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Malware Security Report: Protecting Your Business, Customers, and the Bottom Line. Protect your business and customers by understanding the threat from malware and how it can impact your online business. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427462/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
