Tim Channon wrote:
> Fabien Costantini wrote:
>>> I find it just too satisfying to build FLTK on Windows using
>>> Microsoft's own compiler *without* the IDE.
>> My 2 cents comments on that:
>> Did you notice how many files are needed to be _added_ to the distrib and in
>> subdirs of the distrib, we already have unix makefiles, watcom makefiles and
>> now it would add these ones ?
>> I would like to avoid if possible to add more makefiles to the fltk distrib
>> as much as possible.
>> Also, though it is a indeed a brave intiative to achieve that makefiles (and
>> how fast you did it is somewhat spectacular ;-) , it only addresses the
>> release/static lib mode.
>> I guess it would add more trouble if we try to achieve a complete impl.
>> (debug, dll, win64?)
>> Still, I would dream to have such a feature if it could merge _economically_
>> in a way to the existing Makefiles (at least partially and especially the
>> ones listing the files to be compiled) that we already use for *nix
>> platforms with autoconf/configure/make tools.
>>
>> Just a suggestion, don't know if it is possible.
>
> cmake can target nmake. Isn't that VC command line?
When I last researched it (years ago) I found nmake to be really
limited in its abilities as compared to eg. gmake. Features for
#if'ing and slurping up the output of external shell commands
into variables that are really useful/essential.
_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
fltk-dev@easysw.com
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
