On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:06:57AM -0500, daniel gregory wrote: > > I think we should write a patch… publish is and see how many people > actually use the patched version instead of the real version… then we'd > have an argument against the conservatives that just don't like change.
That's not a bad idea, though I think it should be maintained alongside the unpatched version with equal maintenance and availability for both. Otherwise, it may be that almost nobody uses it. I may not even use it, preferring to script around the undesirable old behavior, if the alternative is to have to patch it myself every time I upgrade or hunt down some non-canonical location for downloads. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
