On Tuesday 03 Mar 2015 16:22:40 Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 3/3/15, Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> wrote:
> > Is there a good reason that “fossil mv” and “fossil rm” must be followed
> > by
> > OS-level mv and rm commands?  I miss the behavior of Subversion which made
> > these into a single step.
> 
> When I have suggested changing this, I got push back that the change
> will break existing scripts.

Add flag -f to mv and rm to do this?
Allows the desired feature and is sort of similar to CVS

fossil mv -f file1 file2
fossil rm -f file1 file2

Roy
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to