On 2016-06-23 10:14:25, Fossil SCM user's discussion wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:26:02 +0200, Fossil SCM user's discussion > <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > > > Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:54:47 > > -0400: > >
> and +1 to all of these points. the present approach replaces an (possbily > serious) annoyance (spam) with a real problem (destroying valuable and > important logical structure from the "set of posts" to the mail list). I agree. This sucks. Also writing because I want some juice spam to inspect. Finally not understanding why the list of subscribers cannot be better controlled, given the underlying issue is a spammer is subscribed to the ML. -guess who _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
