> « [...] I have no idea what you think I wrote. [etc...] »
Ah ?No the answer was for Luca not for you, Scott ... ! :-D
Of, course, little software may not need Gantt software, however it is better
to use such a tool.I will answer all the rest when I could but not now...
Best Regards
K.
De : Scott Robison <sc...@casaderobison.com>
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org>
Envoyé le : Dimanche 13 novembre 2016 18h38
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains
64bit binary
On Nov 11, 2016 5:28 PM, "K. Fossil user" <ticketpersonnal-fos...@yahoo.fr>
wrote:
>
> Ah you don't understand again what I've said ...
>
> 1/ Fossil and SQLite work together, and to be clear, the same guy work for
> both projects.
> I was even told that the AIM of Fossil is to help SQLite.
> Do you agree at least with these ?Yes, fossil & sqlite have a beneficial
> symbiotic relationship.> 2/ When you plan things you are supposed to create a
> Gantt chart or something which help any project.
> For instance, something serious not something else.
> You've said it : Oct 24 Fossil, Nov 04 SQLite.
> I AM SO happy that you've wrote it.I have no idea what you think I wrote.
> Gantt charts are not requirements for successful software. I've written some
> very successful software projects that have been recognized with industry
> awards without ever using a gantt chart. DRH makes new fossil releases
> periodically for the community but he generally suggests using the tip of
> trunk as he usually does himself.> Explain me why a SO serious project could
> not wait for 10 days or if it is not that possible (I don't see why ??), why
> don't Fossil create a 1.36.1?Fossil has never used semantic versioning. I
> don't understand the reason for your continued emphasis on 10 days. Perhaps
> the reason is that people are imperfect, or that they have different
> priorities than you, or that they have simply started blocking your emails
> due to the in your face "I'm right and anyone who disagrees with me is a
> fool" style attitude that comes across in your messages. No, that is not a
> quote from you, but it is how you come across.There are ways to communicate
> that invite people to see your point of view. There are other ways to
> communicate that make people dislike your message no matter how correct it
> might be.>
> [too much] Pride ? Huh ?
>
> My point was : Why do Fossil show a 1.36 FEW days BEFORE SQLite.
> (FEW days IS the key of MY point of view before yours)I believe I addressed
> this above.>
>
> Best Regards
>
> K.
>
>
> ________________________________
> De : Luca Ferrari <fluca1...@infinito.it>
>
> À : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org>
> Envoyé le : Vendredi 11 novembre 2016 11h38
> Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains
> 64bit binary
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:16 PM, K. Fossil user
> <ticketpersonnal-fos...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> > Beyond that, I don't understand why SQlite is not 3.15.1 ...
>
> Seems to me that SQLite 3.15.1 was released on november the 4th, while
> fossil 1.36 was compiled on october the 24th.
>
> Anyway, I cannot find checksums for 1.36 here
> <http://www.hwaci.com/fossil_download_checksums.html>.
>
> Luca
>
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
