Reinier Olislagers  wrote / napĂ­sal(a):
On 28-3-2012 12:22, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 28-3-2012 11:36, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 28.03.2012 11:12, schrieb Reinier Olislagers:
On 28-3-2012 11:04, Sven Barth wrote:
(b) Maybe nobody needed it yet. I myself might be the first one at all
who wanted to interface with Oracle on Windows directly without ODBC. ;)
<snip>
Maybe it was only really tested on Linux...
Mmm... could be...

Thanks Sven, if I get no other answers I think I'll propose a patch that
builds Oracle, PostgreSQL, MSSQL and Sybase on Win64...

On second thoughs: I don't have any need to have these components on x64
Windows and have other priorities (e.g. I'd prefer seeing a working
dbtestframework on Win64 so Firebird embedded etc can get properly
tested), so I think I'll pass on that patch for now.


I still do not understand, why not include (for example new mssqlconnector) with Win64 build? I do not have Win64 machine so I can not test, but I expect, that there is no problem complile FreeTDS/db-lib for Win64 so if only reason for excluding package from Win64 is "missing client library", then this reason is not valid. Can anybody explain please why some sql-db connections are presented on Win64 and some not?
Thanks
-Laco.

_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to