Peter <peter-FHq+SjPhcZrJ7da/qbyxs9bpr1lh4...@public.gmane.org> writes:
> I would advise anyway against using LCL (Qt) on Linux at the moment. > I understand its based on Qt4, and Qt4 is being dropped in favour of > Qt5. At the very least, check how long your distribution will be > supporting Qt4. That’s helpful hint. > I don't think you will get a complete GTK3 in the LCL either at the > moment. Its 'alpha' status according to the wiki. Another one. ;) > fpGui, while it has far fewer features, is independent of these widget > sets and their major version transitions. I must admit I’m heavily leaning towards it at the moment having some very welcome features and less bloat. > I have not used Lazarus for a while, but I think you can use it as an > IDE, while using fpGUI as a component set. Perhaps someone can confirm? Well, ability of fpGUI to use one’s preferred editor is another ’plus’. Sincerely, Gour -- _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
