Of course it is, not implying that it should be the next move by any means.
Freedos has been a "me too" product for many years.



On Jan 13, 2018 6:03 PM, "Ercan Ersoy" <ercaner...@ercanersoy.net> wrote:

> I think developing FreeDOS Arduino port through source code changes and
> some optimizations. Microcontrollers using on Arduino is Harvard
> Architecture. For this reason, FreeDOS Arduino port is requires less
> resource than FreeDOS x86 binaries.
>
> FreeDOS Arduino port may not be realized without major source code
> changes. But, FreeDOS ports of other hardware (Raspberry Pi, Orange Pi,
> CubieBoard, Beagle Bone, Beagle Board etc.) are developable.
>
> Note: I don't have time for creating FreeDOS Arduino port. I won't develop
> FreeDOS ports of other hardware. I suggestted this idea for offering.
>
> Best regards,
> Ercan
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Freedos-devel mailing list
> Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to