On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:36:08PM -0500, Todd T. Fries wrote: > On a side note, perhaps I should release the socket only when the access of > the 'row' pointer is done? Or perhaps the api should be altered (again) to > pass a pointer array into fetch_row so that the socket can be released without > the potential for over-writing prior results? This question was discussed at http://www.mail-archive.com/freeradius-users@lists.cistron.nl/msg07312.html
-- Denis Tatarskikh [UdSU/MF] [UdSU/IC] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
