On Monday, 18 May 2020, 02:38:24 GMT+8, piotrunio-2...@wp.pl <piotrunio-2...@wp.pl> wrote:
> > You showed a few fontforge-generated screenshots, which shows good > > agreement between fontforge and Microsoft rendering. If you think they are > > not good enough, fontforge's github tracker is the place to report it. > It's by no means a good agreement because it's not pixel-for-pixel identical. > In fact, many pixels differ; this is called extremely glitchy and requires > several bugfixes to get it fixed. And FontForge has nothing to do with how > FreeType itself renders, nor does there exist a more accurate mode than the > already existing bilevel mode that's extremely glitchy. There is a bilevel mode in ft2-demo, and you can also switch to v35 to match Microsoft better in ft2-demo, from the default v40. I told you so, many emails ago, in my first reply. If you feel that you know fontforge and freetype well enough to tell which is fontforge and which is freetype, I have nothing more to say on that. Sigh.
