Whose writing is not colored by their cultural biases? I didn't find it to be 
so slanted that I'd consider it to be “tainted," but maybe that's my own 
cultural bias in play. It seemed pretty reasonable to me.  But then, I haven't 
read the book itself.

Gary

On Nov 9, 2013, at 9:51 AM, Parks, Raymond <rcpa...@sandia.gov> wrote:

> The concept is tainted by the cultural biases of the author.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Steve Smith [mailto:sasm...@swcp.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 10:27 PM
> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [FRIAM] 11 American Nations
> 
> An alternative view to the (I can't help but hear it in Dr. Suess' 
> cadence) Red-State Blue-State version of Murrica.   I don't agree with 
> it in detail but in sweeping generalizations (5.5x less general than 
> red/blue?) it captures what I know our cultural "melting pot" to be 
> crufted into:
> 
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2013/11/08/which-of-the-11-american-nations-do-you-live-in/
>  
> 
> 
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> 
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to