The margins were tight in some cases, so Comey and voter suppression tactics in 
places like NC could have been factors.   But no excuses for Wisconsin and 
Pennsylvania it seems to me.    And it wasn’t Nader’s (etc) fault -- that kind 
of discontent needs to be taken seriously by the relevant party in a two party 
system.   There’s also no point in blaming progressives (democrat or not) that 
failed to see the risk here.    It was the DNC and the Clinton campaign’s job 
to make it appealing to voters that wanted a more empathic/emotional appeal.  
If there are to be two big political parties they need to know their 
constituents and how to adapt to them and, frankly, how to lead them to a 
better place when their preferences aren’t going to work (like in the rust 
belt).   Rhetorically, at least, Obama and his campaign, more deftly than H. 
Clinton’s did.

Also, Obama was very careful to avoid the `angry black man’ optics, but I think 
racism has always been a part of the opposition to his administration’s 
legislative efforts.  It could have been much worse if he wasn’t so gifted with 
people.   One of the things that really has shaken me about what happened is 
how Hillary brought out the misogyny of so many men.   One could argue that she 
could have, somehow, optimally navigated that like Obama did, but that doesn’t 
take away from the plain horror of it all.   The larger threat of fascism can 
be resisted, I hope, but I don’t know how to respond to this other than to hang 
my head in shame and take shower after shower.   It is disgusting.

Marcus

From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of cody dooderson
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 9:25 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Trump Is Just A Normal Polling Error Behind Clinton | 
FiveThirtyEight


If "take out the trash" is a code for "sail my house up to Canada", I want to 
"take out the trash" too, nudge nudge.
But seriously how did this happen? Would this have happened with ranked choice 
voting?

On Nov 9, 2016 6:57 AM, "Roger Critchlow" <r...@elf.org<mailto:r...@elf.org>> 
wrote:
Welp, just sitting around shaking my head this morning, think I'll take out the 
trash.

-- rec --


On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Steven A Smith 
<sasm...@swcp.com<mailto:sasm...@swcp.com>> wrote:
Marcus -

It would appear that your fears were more founded than I could have imagined.

It would also seem that I was standing in the wrong lane staring down the 
headlights (again).
    <schmeeeaarrrrrr!>

Small solace, but I am pretty sure Gary took more Trump votes in every case 
than Jill took Hillary ones, if that is not an oversimplification.  If there 
were any spoilers, it was probably in States where Gary split the vote on 
Trump, giving it to Hillary.

To me, there is a paradox in the apparent fact that Populism seems to always 
support or lead to Fascism.  And now "here we go!"

<<What I hear pretty exclusively is "I won't vote for them because nobody else 
is voting for them" or maybe even more pointedly "I won't listen to them 
because nobody else is listening to them".>>
I have been far more afraid of a major regression to our democracy than any 
compulsion to pursue the kind of progressive efforts I would try to advance.   
I don't think my fear was misplaced.    I take some comfort that I was not 
alone in this.   Kind of like that feeling after 9/11 that minor disagreements 
were silly and irrelevant.    Will have to find a way to navigate all this.  
Sigh.
Marcus
________________________________
From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com><mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com> on 
behalf of Steven A Smith <sasm...@swcp.com><mailto:sasm...@swcp.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 5:16:56 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Trump Is Just A Normal Polling Error Behind Clinton | 
FiveThirtyEight


Glen -

I appreciate the nuance here.

I have been dealing with crypto-fascists all of my life... we have discussed 
the libertarian vs the Libertarian,  I have endured the years where Lefty 
political correctness was approaching fascism and I have had to endure the 
Righty style fascism that seems to be hitting a crescendo under the rallying 
cry of that "man-child" running for president.

I isolate myself enough in daily life so as NOT to have to spend too many 
cycles on this constant interpretation, for those who do not have that luxury, 
I understand that this can be deeply painful to the psyche if not the soul.

I refer you to the musical observations of the philosophers known as "They 
Might be Giants":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow-nuHCTA5E

Unfortunately, *I* believe that the language we use in our communication deeply 
informs the language we use to think... and that by adjusting our discourse 
with others can lead us to think (for better or worse) differently.  I believe 
that the damage being done to our culture today is as much the way our thinking 
is modified by this presidential race as it is the possible outcomes.   We are 
leading ourselves to believe that our only two choices are to become a 
xenophobic, retrograde, bigoted people or to continue with a status quo which 
is clearly not serving many, many people very well.

While I don't completely agree with or support Jill and the Greens, I DO 
appreciate the alternative rhetoric they have offered.  Her *very* low polling 
indicates to me that either *many* of us really aren't willing to think outside 
of one of the two boxes offered to us, OR, there is something specifically 
wrong with their message that *I* am not getting?

What I hear pretty exclusively is "I won't vote for them because nobody else is 
voting for them" or maybe even more pointedly "I won't listen to them because 
nobody else is listening to them".

- Steve



On 11/8/16 8:25 AM, ┣glen┫ wrote:

Right.  It's not quite right to suggest that switching codes is bimodal or 
bivalent.  I think it's more of a spectrum, at least in an informal sense.  If 
we were talking about a person trying to communicate a complex idea in a 
non-native language then switching to their native language, that would be more 
bimodal.  But I'm talking more about, eg, realizing in the middle of a 
conversation that you're talking to a crypto-fascist who puts up a good veneer 
at first, then reveals their fascism over the course of the conversation.  When 
I realize it, I switch, either to something that will completely alienate the 
person, or to language that makes me sound more like a fascist, depending on 
how I feel at the time.



Marcus' idea of a an interpreter vs. languages closer to the bare metal is, I 
think, akin to Nick's idea of imaginary vs. factual.  And the gist is solid.  
There's a very high overhead interpreting through many layers of abstraction or 
entertaining imaginary worlds through the suspension of disbelief.  It's a 
luxury we can't always afford.  But both assume there exists a bare metal.  I'm 
a constructivist, for the most part, and believe all our languages are 
interpreted and there really is no such thing as a natural, close to the metal, 
machine code.  There are no linguistic or cognitive facts, only action facts.  
And this may be closer to what you're trying to say, because that means that we 
are always interacting through an interpreter, albeit sometimes many layers out 
vs. only a few layers out.







On 11/07/2016 08:05 PM, Steven A Smith wrote:

I guess I already feel I have to "code switch" all the time already...  I have 
to speak a pidgin of Left/Right/Green/Libertarian/Anarchist just to communicate 
with my friends and colleagues on these matters.  I understand and agree that 
in world D, the emergent patois will be much less familiar/comfortable than the 
one I have now and that in world H, it will be much more familiar, less abrupt 
of a change.  I guess I assumed that Agent G and agent M were more like me in 
this regard than maybe they are.



============================================================

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College

to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to