Harry, this is a hard-core pro-Israeli web site. I read their materials and
it ignores all evidence -- and there is a mountain of it -- that the attack
was deliberate. It gives the standard Israeli story and offers no new
information or line of analysis, and it is based largely on secondary
sources. The site is worthless as a source of information about what
happened, though it does a good job of summarizing the Israeli arguments.

Surely in your research you did more than check out just this site? There
are several books and transcripts of hearings and documentary collections
that you may want to look into, and a good place to start is with the
written accounts of what took place by the men who were on the USS Liberty.

Cheers,
Lawry



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Pollard
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 8:26 PM
To: 'Christoph Reuss'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Futurework] with friends & gov't like these,who needs
al-Qaeda?

Check out:

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/liberty
.html

Harry

**********************************
Henry George School of Social Science
of Los Angeles.
Box 655  Tujunga  CA  91042
818 352-4141
**********************************


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:futurework-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christoph
Reuss
> Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 3:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Futurework] with friends & gov't like these,
who needs al-
> Qaeda?
>
>
> <<the White House deliberately prevented the U.S. Navy
from coming
> to the
>   defense of USS Liberty by recalling Sixth Fleet
military rescue
> support
>   while the ship was under attack ... never before in
American naval
> history
>   has a rescue mission been cancelled when an American
ship was
> under attack>>
>
>
>
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/viewpoints/article
s/0603liber
> ty0603
> .html
>
>
> 'USS Liberty' veterans demand investigation
>
>    Jun. 3, 2007 12:00 AM
>
> Conclusions submitted in October 2003 to the Office of
the U.S.
> Secretary
> of Defense by the USS Liberty Veterans Association, Inc.,
in
> demanding a
> congressional investigation into the aborted rescue
during the attack of
> the USS Liberty and subsequent alleged cover-up.
>
> The group also calls for a new Naval Court of Inquiry and
that June 8
> be
> officially recognized as USS Liberty Remembrance Day.
>
> 1. That on June 8, 1967, after eight hours of aerial
surveillance, Israel
> launched a two-hour air and naval attack against USS
Liberty, the
> world's
> most sophisticated intelligence ship, inflicting 34 dead
and 173
> wounded
> American servicemen (a casualty rate of 70 percent, in a
crew of 294);
>
> 2. That the Israeli air attack lasted approximately 25
minutes, during
> which time unmarked Israeli aircraft dropped napalm
canisters on USS
> Liberty's bridge and fired 30mm cannons and rockets into
our ship,
> causing
> 821 holes, more than 100 of which were rocket-size;
survivors estimate
> 30
> or more sorties were flown over the ship by a minimum of
12 attacking
> Israeli planes which were jamming all five American
emergency radio
> channels;
>
> 3. That the torpedo boat attack involved not only the
firing of
> torpedoes,
> but the machine-gunning of Liberty's firefighters and
stretcher-bearers
> as
> they struggled to save their ship and crew; the Israeli
torpedo boats
> later
> returned to machine-gun at close range three of the
Liberty's life rafts
> that had been lowered into the water by survivors to
rescue the most
> seriously wounded;
>
> 4. That there is compelling evidence that Israel's attack
was a deliberate
> attempt to destroy an American ship and kill her entire
crew; evidence
> of
> such intent is supported by statements from Secretary of
State Dean
> Rusk,
> Undersecretary of State George Ball, former CIA Director
Richard
> Helms,
> former NSA Directors Lt. Gen. William Odom, USA (Ret.),
Adm.
> Bobby Ray
> Inman, USN (Ret.), and Marshal Carter; former NSA deputy
directors
> Oliver
> Kirby and Maj. Gen. John Morrison, USAF (Ret.); and
former
> Ambassador
> Dwight Porter, U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon in 1967;
>
> 5. That in attacking USS Liberty, Israel committed acts
of murder
> against
> American servicemen and an act of war against the United
States;
>
> 6. That fearing conflict with Israel, the White House
deliberately
> prevented the U.S. Navy from coming to the defense of USS
Liberty
> by
> recalling Sixth Fleet military rescue support while the
ship was under
> attack; evidence of the recall of rescue aircraft is
supported by
> statements of Capt. Joe Tully, Commanding Officer of the
aircraft
> carrier
> USS Saratoga, and Rear Admiral Lawrence Geis, the Sixth
Fleet
> carrier
> division commander, at the time of the attack; never
before in
> American
> naval history has a rescue mission been cancelled when an
American
> ship was
> under attack;
>
> 7. That although Liberty was saved from almost certain
destruction
> through
> the heroic efforts of the ship's captain, William L.
McGonagle (MOH),
> and
> his brave crew, surviving crewmembers were later
threatened with
> "court-martial, imprisonment or worse" if they exposed
the truth; and
> were
> abandoned by their own government;
>
> 8. That due to the influence of Israel's powerful
supporters in the
> United
> States, the White House deliberately covered up the facts
of this attack
> from the American people;
>
> 9. That due to continuing pressure by the pro-Israel
lobby in the United
> States, this attack remains the only serious naval
incident that has never
> been thoroughly investigated by Congress; to this day, no
surviving
> crewmember has been permitted to officially and publicly
testify about
> the
> attack;
>
> 10. That there has been an official cover-up without
precedent in
> American
> naval history; the existence of such a cover-up is now
supported by
> statements of Rear Adm. Merlin Staring, USN (Ret.),
former Judge
> Advocate
> General of the Navy; and Capt. Ward Boston, USN, (Ret.),
the chief
> counsel
> to the Navy's 1967 Court of Inquiry of Liberty attack;
>
> 11. That the truth about Israel's attack and subsequent
White House
> cover-up continues to be officially concealed from the
American
> people to
> the present day and is a national disgrace;
>
> 12. That a danger to our national security exists
whenever our elected
> officials are willing to subordinate American interests
to those of any
> foreign nation, and specifically are unwilling to
challenge Israel's
> interests when they conflict with American interests;
this policy,
> evidenced by the failure to defend USS Liberty and the
subsequent
> official
> cover-up of the Israeli attack, endangers the safety of
Americans and
> the
> security of the United States.
>
>
>
> More information: www.ussliberty.org
>
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it
contains the
> keyword
> "igve".
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca
> http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.6/828 - Release
Date:
> 6/1/2007 11:22 AM
>

Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.6/828 - Release
Date: 6/1/2007 11:22 AM



_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to