Thanks, Mike. I'll check out the sources. Too often, people allow themselves to come to conclusions and express opinions on complicated or secretive events without genuine study. I think with old-fashioned research we can often discern what has happened, or at least enough of what has happened that we can make educated guesses about the rest.
The Net, unfortunately, seems to have created a situation in which people have forgotten how to do real study. I just saw you are in Nova Scotia. I was just there for an interesting three weeks, mostly in Cape Breton island. Wish I'd know -- it would have been fun to meet for coffee. Cheers, Lawry -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Spencer Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 2:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Futurework] Re: with friends & gov't like these,who needs al-Qaeda? > "just reading the first one that came up" is a terrible way to do > research, Harry. Indeed. OTOH, the net is loaded with contradictory assertions, claims and observations, largely indistinguisable from fabrications and deliberate disinformation. It's unlikely that we or anyone other than the original players will ever know the truth. This is generally the case with any event in which powerful entities -- governments, corporations, cliques or individuals -- have sufficient motivation for obfuscation that they go to great lengths and expense to muddy the waters. But should you have the time and inclination, this: http://cryptome.org/nsa-liberty.htm http://www.nsa.gov/liberty/ is perhaps your best source for further reading. - Mike -- Michael Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada .~. /V\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] /( )\ http://home.tallships.ca/mspencer/ ^^-^^ _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
