----- Original Message ----
> From: john allspaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Martin Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
> Peter Mui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 1:39:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1 wish list...
> 
> My sincerest apologies for not making it over today, I will be showing my mug 
> there tomorrow.
> 
> My vote on this:
> 
> " - Add some event notification mechanism if metrics go over a limit. But do 
> we 
> want to implement another Nagios?"
> 
> No, no, no, no and no. :)
> 
> All opinion here, but:
> 
> I think to add event notification would be a major mistake, and would pull 
> attention off of what makes ganglia awesome,
> which is the non-judgemental recording of system metrics. There already exist 
> a 
> lot of ways to get ganglia's metrics into Nagios,
> which has all of the bits that you'd want for a notification system. 
> 
> There are so many more cool/good/appropriate things to get into ganglia than 
> event notification.
> -- john allspaw
> flickr.com
>
Hi John,

 I am actually pretty much of the same opinion. Thats why I put the "But, ..." 
into my proposal. I have seen the request before and always thought "do we 
really need another Nagios".

 Similar with gexec/authd. Do they really belong into the monitoring-core? How 
does "integrating" them help recording the metrics?

Cheers
Martin

> 





-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers

Reply via email to