>>> On 7/10/2008 at 12:52 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jesse Becker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 13:15, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm OK with it either way. If we add contrib/ to the package, then we > should still have someplace where we put stuff that we like and think is > valuable, but haven't approved yet. Does that make sense? However a > download page on the wiki or some other kind of web directory listing might > make it easier to reference for the user. > > This is exactly what "contrib" directories are for: things that are > useful and worth distributing as a courtesy, but are *not* directly > supported by the main development team. If something is ever > promoted/taken over by main developers, then it gets removed from > contrib/, and added into the "proper" location elsewhere in the > project.
So what does that mean? Should contrib/ be part of the tarballs, snapshots, releases or just an SVN repository location for misc. stuff? Brad ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
