>>> On 7/10/2008 at 2:06 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jesse Becker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 15:48, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> On 7/10/2008 at 12:52 PM, in message
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jesse Becker"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> This is exactly what "contrib" directories are for:  things that are
>>> useful and worth distributing as a courtesy, but are *not* directly
>>
>> So what does that mean?  Should contrib/ be part of the tarballs, snapshots, 
> releases or just an SVN repository location for misc. stuff?
> 
> Yes.  There usually isn't a lot of churn in contrib/ directories, nor
> are the contents large.  Having them in SVN makes sure that they
> aren't lost, or mistakenly omitted.  Putting them in tarballs/releases
> makes sure that they are distributed (which is the whole point).
> 

So are we OK with distributing everything that is currently in contrib/ 
directory?

Brad



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-developers mailing list
Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers

Reply via email to