Joe Buck wrote: > We might need to go in the other direction (less radical, but enough to > solve the immediate problem). What if only constraints files are > dual-licensed (GPL3+ or GFDL) for now? Then documentation can be > generated from them and we've at least solved that problem. If RMS agrees > to that and sees that the world doesn't end, maybe he'll be open later on > to opening this door wider.
It would be a bit frustrating to have to do this piecemeal, but half a loaf is better than nothing. It's certainly fine with me if you want to suggest that on the SC list -- not that you need my permission! -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery m...@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x713
