+1 KurtS On Mon, Nov 14, 2022, 4:22 AM Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > I feel the discussion phase has finished. There were a few questions > about the existing GDT_Byte unsigned 8-bit integer type, if it should be > renamed/aliased/etc, but no obvious conclusion emerged from this, and > I'd suggest we keep with the status-quo with GDT_Byte, and the RFC > remains on just adding GDT_Int8 for signed 8-bit integer. > > Motion: > > Adopt RFC 87: Signed int8 data type for raster > (https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/6634) > > Starting with my +1, > > Even > > -- > http://www.spatialys.com > My software is free, but my time generally not. > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
