On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Matthieu Riou <matth...@offthelip.org> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> As Martijn alluded to, I think we'd need some more context as to why and >> how they use RTC. >> > Yes, sorry for the lack of details. The context is Cassandra and they're > doing RTC by community choice. They all seem to agree that RTC is the best > for their own codebase given that some parts of it can be pretty tricky. And > even committers who aren't too big on RTC generally speaking seem to agree > that it's working well for them (see [1] for the whole thread, including > Paul's objection). So it really seems to be community driven. > > Thank for the inputs.
Cassandra does about the same thing as hadoop right, where patches go into jira for an explicit +1? While I think that's rather painful (if *I* were to do RTC I would definitely want to manage it within SVN perhaps with the aid of svnmerge.py), I don't think it is _wrong_. If the community really wants to do it that way, I say let them. Sorry Paul :) cheers, Leo PS: for the record I've followed cassandra on and off and I would most likely +1 on a graduation vote. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
