Ok, you can now browse each different build artifact's license, notice, and readme file at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/trunk/[README.txt,NOTICE.txt,LICENSE.txt] - source https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/trunk/lib-license/[README.txt,NOTICE.txt,LICENSE.txt] - lib artifact https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/trunk/dist-license/[README.txt,NOTICE.txt,LICENSE.txt] - binary artifact Please let me know what you think now. Karl On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. <mfrank...@mitre.org> wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Karl Wright [mailto:daddy...@gmail.com] >>Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 1:24 PM >>To: general@incubator.apache.org >>Subject: Re: Question about downloading binaries >> >>"Also, making sure the other comments on NOTICEs are addressed as well." >> >>I have gotten extremely confusing advice in this area in the past, and >>the available documentation does not help. I believe I am adhering to >>Roy's principles, but before we spin another release candidate, I'd >>like it very much if someone with a (hopefully accurate) idea of how >>things are supposed to work reviewed our license and notice files. >>You can find them here: >> >>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/trunk/LICENSE.txt >>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/trunk/NOTICE.txt > > Just looking quickly, the LICENSE file contains a lot of licenses for the > jars you were distributing. For the source release, the ONLY L&N > attributions needed are the ones for code that you are including in your > source. > > If, like many projects, you have no 3rd party source inclusion, the LICENSE > file should only contain ASL 2.0 and the NOTICE should have the standard > developed at apache note. > > For the binary releases, we have been adding entries for any jars we include, > as you have done. There are a couple of tweaks I would suggest, I propose > that you get an agreeable source L&N first as I think there is (yet again) a > wider discussion to be had regarding convenience binaries... > >> >>Thanks! >>Karl >> >>On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Matt Hogstrom <m...@hogstrom.org> wrote: >>>> Hope that helps... The question is, will Roy (or anyone else) be >>>> unwilling to vote for the first option? >>> >>> Having been one of the people that commented and started the thread, I >>feel like I was wearing loose clothing while operating machinery, per Roy's >>guidance on the source being the thing that is voted on and the other binaries >>are merely convenience items, I would support the first option. Also, making >>sure the other comments on NOTICEs are addressed as well. >>> >>> Unfortunate that you god dog piled on but hopefully we're all better >>prepared going forward. >>> >>> Matt Hogstrom >>> m...@hogstrom.org >>> >>> A Day Without Nuclear Fusion Is a Day Without Sunshine >>> >>> On Apr 3, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Karl Wright wrote: >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
